First of all, …entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings (1 Tim. 2:1).

In nothing should the leader be ahead of his fol­lowers more than in the realm of prayer. And yet the most advanced Christian is conscious of the possibil­ity of endless development in his prayer life. Nor does he ever feel that he has “already attained.” Dean C. J. Vaughan once said: “If I wished to humble anyone, I should question him about his prayers. I know nothing to compare with this topic for its sor­rowful self-confessions.”

Prayer is the most ancient, most universal, most intense expression of the religious instinct. It touches infinite extremes, for it is at once the simplest form of speech that infant lips can try and the sublimest strains that reach the Majesty on high. It is indeed the Christian’s vital breath and native air.

But, strange paradox, most of us are plagued with a subtle aversion to praying. We do not naturally delight in drawing near to God. We pay lip service to the delight and potency and value of prayer. We assert that it is an indispensable adjunct (addition; accessory) of mature spiritual life. We know that it is constantly enjoined and exemplified in the Scriptures. But in spite of all, too often we fail to pray.

Let us take encouragement from the lives of men of like passions with ourselves who have conquered their natural reluctance and become mighty men of prayer.

The biographer of Samuel Chadwick wrote:

He was essentially a man of prayer. Every morning he would be astir shortly after six o’clock, and he kept a little room which was his private sanctum for his quiet hour before break­fast. He was mighty in public prayer because he was constant in private devotion. … When he prayed he expected God to do something. “I wish I had prayed more,” he wrote toward the end of his life, “even if I had worked less; and from the bottom of my heart I wish I had prayed better.”1

“When I go to prayer,” confessed an eminent Christian, “I find my heart so loath to go to God, and when it is with Him, so loath to stay.” It is just at that point that self-discipline must be exercised. “When you feel most indisposed to pray, yield not to it,” he counseled, “but strive and endeavor to pray, even when you think you can not pray.”

Mastering the art of prayer, like any other art, will take time, and the amount of time we allocate to it will be the true measure of our conception of its im­portance. We always contrive (arrange; plan) to find time for that which we deem (consider) most important. To most, crowding duties are a reason for curtailing time spent in prayer. To busy Martin Luther, extra work was a compelling argument for spending more time in prayer. Hear his answer to an inquiry about his plans for the next day’s work: “Work, work from early till late. In fact I have so much to do that I shall spend the first three hours in prayer.” If our view of the importance of prayer in any degree approximates that of Luther and Luther’s Lord, we will somehow make more time for it.

It is of course true that prayer poses intellectual problems. But those who are skeptical of its validity and efficacy (effectiveness) are usually those who do not seriously put it to the test, or who fail to comply with the re­vealed conditions. There is no way to learn to pray except by praying. No reasoned philosophy by itself ever taught a soul to pray. But to the man who ful­fills the conditions, the problems are met in the indis­putable fact of answered prayer and the joy of con­scious fellowship with God.

For the supreme example of a life of prayer, the leader will naturally turn to the life of the Lord Him­self, since belief in the rationality and necessity of prayer is based not merely on logic but preeminently on His example and precept. If prayer could have been dispensed with in any life, surely it would have been in that of the sinless Son of Man. If prayer was unnecessary or unreasonable, we would naturally ex­pect it to be omitted from His life and teaching. On the contrary, it was the dominant feature of His life and a recurrent element in His teaching. An examina­tion of its incidence (frequency) reveals that prayer kept the vision of His moral duty sharp and clear. It was prayer that nerved Him to do and endure the perfect but costly will of His Father. Prayer paved the way for the transfiguration. To Him, prayer was not a re­luctant addendum, but a joyous necessity.

D. M. McIntyre wrote:

In Luke 5:16 we have a general statement which throws a vivid light on the daily practice of the Lord. “And He withdrew Himself in the deserts and prayed.” It is not of one occasion but of many that the evangelist speaks in this place. It was our Lord’s habit to seek retire­ment for prayer. When He withdrew Himself from men, He was accustomed to press far into the uninhabited country – He was in the deserts. The surprise of the onlookers lay in this, that One so mighty, so richly endowed (gifted; enabled) with spiritual power, should find it necessary for Himself to repair (to go) to the source of strength, that there He might refresh His weary spirit. To us, the won­der is still greater, that He, the Prince of Life, the Eternal Word, the Only-begotten of the Father, should prostrate Himself in meekness before the throne of God, making entreaty for grace to help in time of need.2

Christ used to spend nights in prayer (Lk. 6:12). He often rose a great while before day in order to have unbroken communion with His Father (Mk. 1:35). The great crises of His life and ministry were preceded by special prayer (e.g., Lk. 5:16), “He Himself would often slip away to the wilderness and pray,” a statement that indicated a regular habit. Both by word and example He impressed upon His disciples the im­portance of solitude in prayer (Mk. 6:46; Lk. 9:28). To the man on whom devolves the responsibility for selecting personnel for specific spiritual responsi­bilities, the example of the Lord in His choice of His disciples is luminous.

Both our Lord and His bondslave Paul made clear that true prayer is not pleasant dreamy reverie. “All vital praying makes a drain on a man’s vitality. True intercession is a sacrifice, a bleeding sacrifice,” wrote J. H. Jowett. Jesus performed many mighty works without outward sign of strain, but of His praying it is recorded, “He offered up both prayers and suppli­cations with strong crying and tears” (Heb. 5:7).

How pale a reflection of Paul’s and Epaphras’ strivings and wrestlings are our pallid (pale) and languid (lazy) intercessions! “Epaphras … laboring earnestly for you in his prayers,” wrote Paul to the believers at Colossae (Col. 4:12). And to the same group, “I want you to know how great a struggle I have on your behalf” (Col. 2:1, NASB). The word for “wrestling,” “struggle,” is that from which our “agonize” is derived. It is used of a man toiling at his work until utterly weary (Col. 1: 29), or competing in the arena for the coveted prize (1 Cor. 9:25). It describes the soldier battling for his life (1 Tim. 6:12), or a man struggling to deliver his friend from danger (Jn. 18:36). From those and other considerations it is clear that true praying is a strenuous spiritual exercise that demands the ut­most mental discipline and concentration.

It is encouraging to recall that Paul, probably the greatest human exponent and example of the exercise of prayer, confessed, “We do not know how to pray as we should.” But he hastened to add, “The Spirit also helps our weakness … but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words; and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God” (Rom. 8:26-28). The Spirit links Himself with us in our praying and pours His supplications into our own.

We may master the technique of prayer and under­stand its philosophy; we may have unlimited confi­dence in the veracity and validity of the promises con­cerning prayer; we may plead them earnestly. But if we ignore the part played by the Holy Spirit, we have failed to use the master key.

Progressive teaching in the art of praying is needed, and the Holy Spirit is the master Teacher. His as­sistance in prayer is more frequently mentioned in Scripture than any of His other offices. All true pray­ing stems from His activity in the soul. Both Paul and Jude teach that effective prayer is “praying in the Spirit.” The phrase has been interpreted as praying along the same lines, about the same things, in the same name, as the Holy Spirit. True prayer rises in the spirit of the Christian from the Spirit who indwells him.

“Praying in the Spirit” may have a dual signifi­cance. It may mean praying in the realm of the Spirit, for the Holy Spirit is the sphere and atmosphere of the Christian’s life. But in fact, many of our prayers are psychical rather than spiritual. They move in the realm of the mind alone, the product of our own thinking and not of the Spirit’s teaching. But it is something deeper. The type of praying envisaged (pictured) in that phrase “utilizes the body, demands the coopera­tion of the mind, but moves in the supernatural realm of the Spirit.” That kind of prayer transacts its business in the heavenly realm.

But the phrase “praying in the Spirit” may also mean praying in the power and energy of the Spirit. “Give yourselves wholly to prayer and entreaty; pray on every occasion in the power of the Spirit,” is the New English Bible rendering of Ephesians 6:18. For its superhuman task, prayer demands more than mere human power, and that is supplied by the Holy Spirit. He is the Spirit of power as well as the Spirit of prayer. Human energy of heart and mind and will can achieve only human results, but praying in the Holy Spirit releases supernatural resources.

It is the Spirit’s delight to aid the man entrusted with spiritual leadership in his moral and physical weakness in the matter of prayer, for the praying soul labors under three handicaps. But in each of them he may count upon the Spirit’s assistance. Sometimes he is kept from prayer by the conscious iniquity of his heart. As he trusts Him, the Holy Spirit will lead and enable him to appropriate the cleansing of that mighty solvent, the blood of Christ. Then the spiritual leader is hampered by the ignorance of his mind. The Spirit, who knows the mind of God, will share that knowl­edge with him as he receptively waits on Him. He does that by imparting a clear conviction that a petition is or is not according to the will of God. Again, the spiritual leader will often be earthbound through the benumbing infirmity of his body, and especially so if he lives in the enervating (weakening in mind and/or body) climate of the tropics. The Spirit will quicken his mortal body in response to his faith and will enable him to rise above adverse physical and climatic conditions.

In addition to those personal handicaps, the praying man has to overcome the subtle opposition of Satan who will seek to oppress or depress, to create doubt or discouragement. In the Holy Spirit, the praying man has been given a heavenly ally against a super­natural adversary.

The foregoing thoughts are doubtless not new ground to many who have read them, but is the mighty assistance, the power, of the Spirit in prayer a present and enjoyed experience? Have we slipped into an unintentional independence of the Spirit in prayer? Are we habitually “praying in the Spirit” and receiving the full answer to our prayers? It is very easy for our intellectual apprehension of spiritual truths to outrun our practical experience of their reality and power.

Prayer is frequently represented in Scripture under the figure of spiritual warfare. “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Eph. 6:12). In that phase of the prayer life, three personalities are involved, not two. Between God on the one hand and the devil on the other, stands the praying man. Though weak in himself, he occupies a strategic role in the deathless struggle between the dragon and the Lamb. The power and authority he wields are not inherent, but are delegated to him by the victorious Christ to whom he is united by faith. His faith is the reticulating (connecting) system through which the victory gained on Calvary over Satan and his hosts reaches the cap­tives and delivers them.

Throughout the gospels, the thoughtful reader will discern that Jesus was concerned not so much with the wicked men and the evil conditions He confronted as with the forces of evil at the back of them. Behind well-meaning and ever-vocal Peter, behind the traitor­ous Judas, Jesus saw the hand of Satan. “Get behind me, Satan,” was the Lord’s response to Peter’s well-intentioned but presumptuous rebuke. We see men around us bound in sin and in captivity to the devil, but our concern in prayer should be not only to pray for them but to pray against Satan who holds them captive. He must be compelled to relax his grip on them, and that can be achieved only by Christ’s victory on the cross. Jesus dealt with the cause rather than the effect, and the leader should adopt the same method in that aspect of his praying. And he must know how to lead those under him to victory in that spiritual warfare.

In a graphic illustration, Jesus likened Satan to a strong man, fully armed, who kept his palace and goods in peace. Before he could be dispossessed and his captives released, Jesus said he must first be bound, or rendered powerless. Only then could the rescue be effected (Matt. 12:28-29). What does it mean to “bind the strong man” if not to neutralize his power by drawing on the conquering power of Christ, who was manifested “to destroy [nullify, render in­operative] the works of the devil”? And how can that be done but by the prayer of faith, which lays hold on the victory of Calvary and believes for its repetition in the specific context of the prayer? We must not make the mistake of reversing our Lord’s order and expect to effect the rescue without first dis­arming the adversary. The divinely delegated author­ity placed in our hands may be confidently exercised, for did not our Lord say to His weak disciples, “Be­hold, I have given you authority … over all the power of the enemy” (Lk. 10:19)?

Because leadership is the ability to move and in­fluence people, the spiritual leader will be alert to discover the most effective way of doing that. One of the most frequently quoted of Hudson Taylor’s state­ments is his expression of conviction that “it is pos­sible to move men, through God, by prayer alone.” In the course of his missionary career he demonstrated its truth a thousand times. However, it is one thing to give mental assent to his motto, but quite another thing consistently to put it into practice. Men are difficult objects to move, and it is much easier to pray for temporal needs than for situations that involve the intricacies and stubbornness of the human heart.

In considering the problem, the first thing to re­member is that God is always consistent with Himself in His actions. He does not contradict Himself. If He promises to answer the prayer of faith, He will do so, but not in a manner that would be contrary to His divine nature. He will fulfill all His obligations, but in a way consistent with His own attributes and undertakings, for “He cannot deny Himself.” No word or action will contradict any other word or action.

Then there is the indisputable fact that intercessory prayer is a divine ordinance. Since God has ordained it, we can be confident that as we fulfill the revealed conditions, the answer will most surely be granted, despite any seeming problems that might be involved. God obviously sees no insuperable problem or contradiction between human will and His answering prayer. When He commands us to pray “for kings and those that are in authority,” there is implicit in the command the assurance that our prayers can move them and significantly influence the course of events. Whether or not we find a final men­tal answer to our prayer problems, we are still under obligation to pray.

Further, we can know the will of God concerning the subject of the prayer we offer, and that fact con­stitutes the basis for our being able to pray the prayer of faith. God can speak to us very convincingly through the channel of our own faculties. We have the Word of God, which presents the will of God on all matters of principle. We have the ministry of the Holy Spirit in our hearts, interceding for us according to the will of God (Rom. 8:26-27). As we patiently seek to discover God’s will concerning our petition, the Spirit will impress us whether or not it is the will of God. It is that God-given conviction that enables us to proceed beyond the prayer of hope to the prayer of faith.

In prayer, we deal directly with God and only in a secondary sense with men and women. The goal of prayer is the ear of God. It is not the prayer that moves men, but the God to whom we pray.

To move men, the leader must be able to move God, for He has made it clear that He moves them through the prayers of the intercessor. If a scheming Jacob could be given “power with God and with men,” then is it not possible for any leader who is willing to comply with the conditions to enjoy the same power (Gen. 32:28)?

Prevailing prayer of that kind is the outcome of a correct relationship with God. Reasons for unan­swered prayer are stated with great clarity in Scrip­ture, and they all center on the believer’s relation­ship with God. He will not be party to petitions of mere self-interest, nor will He countenance (allow; put up with) im­purity of motive. Sin clung to and cherished will effectively close His ear. Least of all will He tolerate unbelief, the mother of sins. “He who comes to God must believe(Heb. 11:6, italics added). Every­where in prayer there is the condition, either expressed or implied, that the paramount motive in praying is the glory of God.

The eminence of great leaders of the Bible is at­tributable to the fact that they were great in their praying. They were not leaders because of brilliancy of thought, because they were exhaustless in re­sources, because of their magnificent culture or na­tive endowment, but because God sovereignly willed it so.

NOTES

  1. N.G. Dunning, Samuel Chadwick (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1934), p. 19.
  2. D. M. McIntyre, The Prayer Life of Our Lord (London: Morgan & Scott, n.d.), pp. 30-31.

J. Oswald Sanders, Spiritual Leadership, edited

 

Let us know what you think.